-
From AI-Assisted EDA to AI-Mediated Engineering
Reflections on DAC 2026, where agentic methods made up about 28% of the agenda and AI submissions had risen from under 300 in 2023 to about 700. Sets out the two technical routes, replacing the tool engines or wrapping them, and argues for evidence-grounded loops in which AI proposes and physics, formal methods or simulation decides.
-
Interview with Simon Davidmann, AI + EDA Researcher and Former CEO of Imperas
Interview by Daniel Nenni on the move from Imperas and Synopsys to AI+EDA research at the University of Southampton. Covers how RISC-V users building AI accelerators led to this research, published results of ML in verification ranging from 85% less RTL simulation to 10% better coverage, Davidmann's Dilemma and Test, and why the larger opportunity for start-ups is a holistic rethink of the toolchain.
-
DAC 2026: Users Are Not Waiting; DIY AI Is Now in Vogue
Frank Schirrmeister's DAC 2026 report on chip design teams building their own AI flows, with reference to my framework and the Exhibitor Forum panel.
-
AI in EDA Is Real, It's Now, and It's on Show at DAC 2026
Frank Schirrmeister's preview of DAC 2026, built around two ideas from my work. Davidmann's Dilemma: "every camp acting rationally guarantees the collectively wrong outcome". Davidmann's Test: "Does it change what you can verify, or just how fast you run what you already verify?"
-
An AI Model Fit For Purpose
Quoted on judging AI models for EDA: accuracy has to separate syntactic correctness, functional correctness and formal completeness, and a model's reliability is bounded by the distribution of the data it was trained on.
-
Can AI Create Missing Models?
Quoted on using AI to create missing models: functional correctness and implementation correctness are different properties, and production use of AI-generated design content needs verification in the loop.
-
The next EDA wave: Lessons from DATE 2026
A review of DATE 2026 in Verona. AI now appears as a workload, a design tool, a research method and a security risk, and the move from single prompts to multi-agent, tool-grounded flows makes verification and security first-class constraints. Closes with the case for European capability in AI+EDA, built on its universities, its RISC-V community and its safety-critical industries.
-
Creating Agentic EDA Methodologies
Quoted on agentic EDA flows across many tools, vendors and data formats, and on companies with very large resources building their own AI solutions in-house.
-
The Magic of Agentic AI Will Come From a Holistic Approach to Chip Design
Interview on agentic AI in chip design. Most agentic tools today optimise existing flows; larger gains come from treating design, synthesis, verification and layout as one system, which some large technology companies already do in-house. New EDA start-ups aiming at step-function improvements need investors prepared to fund them.
-
What is the EDA problem worth solving with AI?
Most AI work in EDA speeds up what engineers already do. This article looks at the positions of the large EDA vendors, the agentic start-ups and the in-house teams at large chip companies, and proposes foundation models specialised with formal and domain structure, open APIs and serious collaboration between industry and universities.
-
Using Data And AI More Effectively In EDA
Quoted on the data available for AI in EDA: most of it is "human first", produced for engineers to read, and RVVI was built to give a trace that tools can interact with.
-
Maintaining Momentum When the Tide Turns
-
The Future of System Level Design
-
Co-Design: A Question of Communication?